66 pages • 2 hours read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Change dominates The Leopard. The slow, gradual decline of the Sicilian nobility contrasts with the rapid, accelerating change of the revolutionary forces as they fight for a unified Italy. Despite this constant change, however, Prince Fabrizio is convinced that nothing will truly change. The stratification of society will remain in place, even if those at the top change. As the patriarch of a family in decline, whose wealth is being overtaken by non-aristocrats like Don Calogero, Fabrizio charges himself with navigating this change so that his family’s way of life can remain the same as much as possible. His tacit endorsement of unification and his grudging approval of Tancredi’s marriage to Angelica suggest that Fabrizio is ready to sanction change even as he wishes to shut himself off from the actual world. He prefers to hunt, to dine, to study the unchanging stars, and to entertain his old family traditions. He negotiates with the new government, but only to acquire passes so that he can take his family on their regular holiday. He declines the offer of a position in the new government because he does not feel connected to the political project of a unified Italy. These gestures toward change are hollow and performative: Prince Fabrizio only entertains change on the surface, deliberately ignoring the more pressing changes that are sweeping society.
Tancredi functions as the voice of change in the novel. Whereas Fabrizio is focused on preserving the status quo, Tancredi is willing to seize change with both hands. He fights alongside the rebels, wearing the red ribbon to signal himself as an agent of change in Italy. He is willing to marry a bourgeois woman to improve his own fortunes, and he argues that the bloodlines of the nobility should be renewed occasionally to prevent them from stagnating. This is the crux of Tancredi’s argument and illustrates why he is very much his uncle’s protégé: Tancredi is an active advocate for change, but only to preserve what he can of the old order. He and Fabrizio are united in this effort, though Tancredi is more pragmatic and practical about change. Tancredi actively involves himself in the revolution to prevent it being dominated by radicals. He marries a peasant girl to enrich himself and to bolster his political power. He argues in favor of diminishing his own status, so that he might have some status left when the dust settles. If Fabrizio is certain that nothing will truly change, then Tancredi believes that he can control the change that occurs. He is the one who utters the novel’s best-known line, and the line that encapsulates this theme. Speaking to his uncle Fabrizio, Tancredi says, “If we want things to stay as they are, things will have to change” (19). The paradoxical quality of the aphorism highlights the paradoxes underlying aristocratic life in a revolutionary era. Tancredi makes himself an active agent of the changing world, but he does so with the aim of preserving as much of his privilege as he can. He accepts that change is necessary and inevitable, but only insofar as he hopes to preserve what he can of the status quo.
Change is shown to be inevitable. Fabrizio dies in Chapter 7, still caught in the gradual decline of his family status but not living long enough to witness its inevitable demise. He lives just long enough to see how much the world has changed and to know that he has failed to preserve the status quo. Death is inevitable; the change from life to death is one example of a change that even the Prince is powerless to stop. By Chapter 8, Tancredi is dead too. The three Salina daughters have become spinsters, locked away in their chapels, praying to fake relics. Angelica, now widowed, is Tancredi’s legacy to the world. Through his teaching, she plays the part of an aristocrat even though her ancestry makes this performance into a farce. The rich remain rich, the poor remain poor, but the aristocratic society at the end of The Leopard is a dull, decayed echo of what came before. As much as it is the same, everything has changed.
The decline of the Sicilian nobility in The Leopard is portrayed against the backdrop of broader class conflict. In this time, Garibaldi and the Piedmontese troops are undertaking a military campaign to unify Italy. At the beginning of the novel, this unified Italy exists only in abstract terms. The characters can project their hopes and dreams onto an idea of Italy, giving themselves cause to fight. One of the primary motivations for this revolution, particularly among those outside the nobility, is greater social mobility. As Fabrizio observes, the social order of Sicily is ancient and has long appeared immovable. But that time is over. As Fabrizio witnesses the decline of his own social class, he must also witness the rise of those he considers to be beneath him. Don Calogero represents the rising bourgeoisie, who believe that a unified Italy will offer them the power and status that have been denied to them by the nobility. Fabrizio is wary of the unification, fearing for his own status, while others welcome the unification for this exact same reason. The redistribution of wealth and power in a newly unified Italy is, in essence, a class war that brings together those who have been excluded from the halls of power.
Though he never thinks of himself as such, Prince Fabrizio is a critic of the wealth inequality in Sicilian society. He has long benefited from the imbalance in wealth and power, but as this privilege is threatened, he thinks of the brewing class war in the most cynical of terms. According to the Prince, very little will change. Rather than creating a more equal society and flattening the social classes, he predicts that the people at the top of the class structure will simply be replaced. He deplores the “petty little local Liberals” (25), such as Don Calogero, who care only for their own status. Liberal politics and the revolution to unify Italy become, from this perspective, the antithesis of a class war. Rather than dismantling social class, Fabrizio predicts that the self-interested middle-class liberals will simply recreate the same hierarchical structure while placing themselves at the top. Some of the middle class will become the dominant ruling class. It is, to Fabrizio, a striking example of class unity, in which the supposed rebels claim to be fighting for complete change while actually fighting for the preservation of the inequality that has served him so well. People are not united by class, the Prince predicts, but by self-interest.
In the novel, the class war is fought not on the distant battleground but on the grounds of culture. The actual fighting of the class war takes place almost entirely away from the narrative. Tancredi shares war stories with the family, while Colonel Pallavincino delights party guests with tales of shooting Garibaldi. Conflict occurs away from the narrative and, at least according to reports in the novel, very little blood is shed. Rather, the class war takes on a subtler, quieter form. Fabrizio’s increased snobbery toward Don Calogero shows that the threat to his status intensifies his class awareness. Don Calogero may have more money, but he lacks the etiquette that—Fabrizio believes—distinguishes the nobility. He sneers at Don Calogero because he feels threatened, needing to assure himself that there is something immutable and worthy about his status than differentiates him from mere men with money. Fabrizio revels in these quieter aspects of the class war because they are all he has left. Social etiquette becomes a consolation for losing a class war. He needs to convince himself that there is some innate dignity or worth to his status, rather than the accident of his birth. He witnesses Don Calogero’s business dealings firsthand, and he respects Calogero’s shrewdness, though he dismisses it as animal cunning, not becoming of true nobility. Class war is reduced to these tensions because, in effect, the war is already over: Prince Fabrizio and his peers have already lost.
Throughout The Leopard, Fabrizio is urged to take an active role in the changing world around him. The government of the newly unified Italy tries to recruit him as a Senator, for example, but he declines. His explanation for refusing the post reveals his preoccupation with the uniquely Sicilian character. As an aristocrat, Fabrizio has had plenty of time to reflect on his homeland and its people. While his experiences are gleaned from the privileged perspective of a Prince, he has spent more time than most trying to define what makes Sicilians unique, particularly in comparison to the other Italians from the mainland. Fabrizio has come to see the Sicilian character as a kind of death cult. Death affects everything in Sicily, he claims, and people are uninterested in any idea ideas until these ideas are already dead. To Fabrizio, this is a product of the unique history of Sicily. For millennia, he explains, Sicily has been colonized by other empires. Outsiders have come to Sicily and attempted to impose their culture on the local people, only for a Sicilian archetypal character to endure nonetheless. This immobility, this sense of being trapped and dictated to, has molded the Sicilians. The Sicilian culture is not interested in the outside world. This disinterest in change has led to Sicilian culture becoming stagnant and pessimistic, he feels, with death and decay the only defining feature. The effort of surviving under a string of colonizing powers has limited the development of a Sicilian character beyond this pessimism and decay.
Many of the book’s characters—though notably not Father Pirrone, the Church’s representative—view the Catholic Church as the anchor and guarantor of this cultural stasis. As an ancient and seemingly unchanging institution, the Church operates as a source of meaning and continuity analogous to the ancient, noble families that dominate Sicilian life. Fabrizio makes this connection explicit, keeping Father Pirrone around as a living emblem of his own virtue while largely ignoring the Church’s actual teachings. In the opening chapter, he flouts Christian morality by inviting Father Pirrone to accompany him to a brothel. He mocks the priest the next day when Father Pirrone suggests that he make Confession, arguing that there is no need, since the priest already knows what he did. For Fabrizio, his close relationship with a priest is not a means to salvation or spiritual enlightenment but a signifier of privilege and tradition. The house of Salina must remain close to the Church—and the Church wishes to remain close to the family—because each institution legitimizes the other. This mutually reinforcing relationship stretches back centuries, establishing the historical continuity that gives both the Church and the aristocracy its cultural power.
As both institutions cling to the past, however, they risk stagnation and therefore death.
After Fabrizio’s death, his daughter Concetta lives on in a rapidly changing world. Unlike Fabrizio, she lives to see the aristocracy become irrelevant, and thus her fixation on the past becomes even more deadly than that of her father. Concetta was long thought of by Fabrizio as the true heir to the Salina nobility. She is the only child who embodied his notion of the Sicilian character. While her spinster sisters are devout believers, Concetta is only interested in the Church as a means of clinging to the last vestiges of prestige. Concetta recognizes the political power of conspicuous Catholicism. The chapels and relics that she and her sisters have gathered distinguish them from other people in Palermo. They stand apart due to their public relationship with the Church; Concetta, in private, is barely more of a believer than her father. This proves ironic when the officials from the Church reveal most of the relics to be fake. The sisters—themselves living relics of a past world—are so invested in these relics that they now seem ridiculous. The Salina family’s devotion to its own privilege is revealed to be just as false as the relics in their chapels. The status of the family could not stand up to scrutiny, so the Catholic Church—once a key source of the Sicilian aristocracy’s legitimacy—becomes the arbiter of its decline. The obsession with death that the Prince once spoke so eloquently about comes full circle, with the downfall of his family and his culture measured out in the devotion to the fake bones and blood that were displayed so proudly in the family chapel.
Plus, gain access to 9,100+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Equality
View Collection
Italian Studies
View Collection
Memory
View Collection
Mortality & Death
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
School Book List Titles
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
The Past
View Collection